On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:53:48PM +0000, Pedro Pessoa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:38:46AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:31:28AM +0000, Paulo Trezentos wrote: > > > Hi Aleksey and all, > > > > > > We have tested with success the new version of the packages. > > > In this moment, we are focused in get Sugar to work as a collaborative > > > tool for the classroom. > > > I believe this would turn Sugar in a "killer application" for Magallaen > > > in Linux Caixa Mágica Mag and people would start to install it in large > > > scale. > > > > > > The idea is to put Sugar to communicate with WiFi (ad-hoc) and Telepathy. > > > If I remember correctly, it is needed DBUS 1.1. Any other hint? > > > Pedro Pessoa is the person responsible for this task. > > is it ok for Mag to start NetworkMangaer at startup > > You mean Gnome NM? yup, http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/NetworkManager
> Magalhães has it's own NM, inherited from Mandriva. It has been the > basis for connectivity management on the project. I would give it some > though before trying to replace it by something else. Instead, maybe we can > integrate it into Sugar somehow. there could be a problem: sugar-0.84 uses NM-0.7's interface but NM-0.7 requires dbus-1.1, sugar repo has dbus-1.1 but uses it only for session bus within sugar session Don't know how it could affect stability of the whole system if system bus will be dbus-1.1 and clients(non-sugar, since sugar's components were built against dbus-1.1) will use dbus-1.0 clients > How does Sugar integrate with NM currently? I don't have it on my test > machines. sugar uses NM only in RO manner(to collect info about IP, or so) -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel