On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 20:16 +0800, KSChan wrote: > Greetings, > > > Thx Jameson for clarifying ^^ I further get a few questions in mind. > > > 1. question on Karma... > I'm not quite familiar with webkit (although I always use it ^^") Does > webkit already support the html 5 draft ? > And, can someone clarify for me that ... Is the project Karma aims to > develop a run-time environment so that it can renders html5 + js > created activity (which does not start a browser activity) on top of > sugar?
Webkit supports much of html5, certainly the parts we care about most which are embedding animation and audio w/out flash. Karma doesn't aim to develop a new run-time but use an existing run-time like Titanium or just regular firefox and extend that run-time to take advantage of Sugar's special features, particularly collaboration. > 2. question on Imporved Read Activity... > After reading the message > on http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-March/012821.html, is > it aims to modify the current Read activity so that it merge the functions of > Read and ReadEText?? Or, even fork a new "Read" so that it identifies when to > use Read engine and when to use ReadEText. > > > 3. question on Improved Imageviewer... > Does current Sugar implementation allows BT like peer2peer > communication? Does the image sharing only does a point2point file > transfer? > > > Many thanks =] > > > kschan. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Jameson Quinn > <jameson.qu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Questions like that are best sent to sugar-devel, this list is > just for gsoc administrative/operational questions. > > To answer: the idea is to make hooks so you can save to > journal, do collaboration, and easily set up a sugar-like UI, > from inside Flash; and to make a demo activity which shows off > these hooks by packaging an SWF as a sugar activity. However, > discussion on sugar-devel has shown that people think that the > AJAX Sugar/ Karma idea has a bigger bang for the buck, for > various reasons. We'd still consider a good SWF Sugar > application, but if it's the same to you we'd prefer the same > for AJAX (using titanium, I guess). > > Jameson > > 2009/3/23 KSChan <mr.ksc...@gmail.com> > > Hi, > > > I'm a undergrad from hong kong, china. In these few > weeks, I'm keeping my eyes on gsoc and at the same > time assisting the simplified chinese translation work > for olpc-asia. The translation work is almost done and > thus it is the time for me to spend effort on sugar^^. > > > I would like to know more about a brainstorming idea > on > SWF_Sugar > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/ProjectIdeas#SWF_Sugar. Is it > aiming at translating .swf into sugar activity? Or, building an activity to > support .swf? Or, even compiling .as into sugar activity?? > > > Can anyone clarify for me ^^? > > > kschan. > > > -- > I, have a dream. I want to make my dream come true. > Anyway, OLPC Rocks! > > http://mr.kschan.googlepages.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > GSoC mailing list > g...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/gsoc > > > > > > -- > I, have a dream. I want to make my dream come true. Anyway, OLPC > Rocks! > > http://mr.kschan.googlepages.com > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Bryan W. Berry Technology Director OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel