Sankarshan, You are absolutely right and it has been done deliberately. I have seen over the past that keeping the initial testing cycles small helps keep everybody on their toes. It is like the 80-20 rule, 80% of the bugs are small and irritating which if solved early save a lot of trouble.
But, I have a very limited experience in product release, and we might extend the beta period. It will be for the community to decide on the quality of the software as and when to extend the beta cycle. Deepank. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < foss.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/3/26 Deepank Gupta <deepankgu...@gmail.com>: > > > Incorporated Changes in the proposal after talking with bemasc, BryanWB > and > > Martin Langoff on IRC and mails... The proposal reflects the recent > changes. > > Please take a look and comment on it. > > > > The link is : http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Educational_Toolkit > > For what it is worth, your time-line for testing cycles seem a bit on > the optimistic side. > > -- > > http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published > http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science > http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work > Sent from Calcutta, WB, India >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
