Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 17:37 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:18:37AM -0500, David Farning wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes wrote: > >>>Le mercredi 01 avril 2009 à 14:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > >>>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Guillaume Desmottes > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >The Debian package write logs to /var/log/gadget.log iirc; > >> > >>>> What Debian package? Gadget does not seem to be in Debian Sid. I'd > >>>> be happy to help maintain it officially for Debian if there is > >>>> already a Gadget package floating around unofficially. > >>> > >>>See http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/log/?h=debian > >> > >> Above URL does not clarify if it is in Debian officially. > >> > >> If my questions are too silly to respond to with human words (as > >> opposed to just URLs), then I shall not bother you anymore with them. > > > >Please try to stay polite. > > Hi Guillaume (and everyone else),
Hi (CCing Daf who is the author of this Debian package). > Sorry for being rude. > > You mention a Debian package, and I wonder: > > 1. Is it a Debian package of Gadget, ejabberd or something else? The link I pasted you is a git branch of Gadget containing a 'debian' directory used for the packaging. These files are http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/gadget/tree/debian?h=debian > 2. If it is a Gadget package, is it targeted for Debian officially? It could but has not been proposed to Debian yet. > 3. If yes, are you interested in help maintaining such package? > > 4. If no, are you interested in helping maintain it officially? Sure. Any help is welcome. > Your brief response above seems to indicate that indeed it is a Gadget > package. > > I am still interested in clarification about questions 2, 3 and 4. > > If you answer with a URL, then I would appreciate that you also write > some human words too, as I believe (contrary to David, possibly) that it > can help avoid misunderstandings. Sorry, I was quite busy when I replied to your mail. Hope it's clearer now. G. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel