On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:57 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:17:17PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > > And... we're moving away from generic-ising Sugar's main contact > > points. Whatever happened with the idea of riding on gnome's overahaul > > of the file picker / manager? > I think we are currently running ahead of Gnome and do the research > work. Once we figured out how it works best (which will take at least > another major change as legacy app support is out of scope for my GSoC > project), we can join forces with them. > Of course that doesn't prevent us watching them and adopting part of > their work if it's already useful to us. We have to care about which > platforms / distro releases Sugar runs on as well, though, so using > bleeding edge code must be considered carefully.
Indeed, I think the Gnome work referred to is Gnome Zeitgeist [1], and is scheduled for release as part of 'GNOME 3.0' in a year. Zeitgeist seems to be the file manager overhaul, but I could swear I remember people talking about a GNOME olpcfs-ish file versioning system months back, but can't seem to find any references to this offhand. Bobby 1 - http://live.gnome.org/GnomeZeitgeist > CU Sascha > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel