On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:42 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > [adding sugar-devel again to CC] > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 14:36, Marten Vijn <i...@martenvijn.nl> wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:34, NoiseEHC <noise...@freemail.hu> wrote: <cut> > >> > >> Just copying files is unlikely to work. Regarding newer versions of > >> Sugar working in the XO-1, I personally think it's very important and > >> hope that others share this opinion > > > > I would love to see something an update kernel (OpenBSD) or mini-dist to > > roll out never version. > > > >> and will contribute their time and > >> skills to make it happen. > > > > Well I can help testing (or learn C, but that will take a while ;( ) > > Well, for this task (shipping an updated or new distro for the XO) > there's little need for programming skills, it's mostly a matter of > having someone who leads the effort and recruits people to help with > the various tasks, give publicity to the effort, keep track of the > open issues in the different bug trackers involved, help with > packaging, do integration testing, etc.
oke, from a side of a none developer, I would be good, a list of tasks to: - to do meself - point people to For me is hard to so see what is needed and to move to the "right direction". Knowing a bit from linux it is best to avoid dist-wars. I 'll check the wiki and look/create for a task list. IHMO tasks shoud be: - do-able (beginning / end / clear steps) - supported by a person - avoiding flames/wars whatever negative energie - complexicity index. Am I correct (by kind of consensus) that a tasklist would help? > That's why people are barking at the wrong tree when they say that > Sugar developers should port Sugar to whatever system. The skills > involved are very different from upstream work and if coders are not > coding we won't have anything new to ship. > If barking ever applies me to please let me know. My intention is to have usable contributions to our project. Kind regards, Marten > Regards, > > Tomeu > > > Marten > > > >> Regards, > >> > >> Tomeu > >> > >> > ps: > >> > If overwriting the old Sugar works on an XO-1 then an unzippable > >> > "distribution" what could be applied to 802 would be just fine... > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Sugar-devel mailing list > >> > Sugarfirstname.lastname@example.org > >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sugar-devel mailing list > >> Sugaremail@example.com > >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- > > Marten Vijn > > linux 2.0.18 OpenBSD 3.6 FreeBSD 4.6 > > http://martenvijn.nl > > http://opencommunitycamp.org > > http://wifisoft.org > > > > > > -- Marten Vijn linux 2.0.18 OpenBSD 3.6 FreeBSD 4.6 http://martenvijn.nl http://opencommunitycamp.org http://wifisoft.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugarfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel