On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:14, Martin Dengler<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:02:21AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I guess there's some other package that installs files in those dirs, >> thus the conflict. > > That is one of the cracktastic-est ways to resolve that conflict that > I can think of :). I was told on IRC that the rpm has never worked, > so I guess this is just some cruft that has slipped through the > cracks. > > I guess this package should stop inlining bitfrost then, and depend on > it in some way. Sounds like a thing for someone who knows more about > packaging than I.
Peter Robinson (cc'ed) took recently ownership of several/all sugar packages, maybe he could give a look at untangling this mess? Thanks, Tomeu >> Maybe we should check rainbow? > > Good idea. > >> Regards, >> >> Tomeu > > Martin > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
