Well, I'm not going to get dug deeper into a semantic discussion here. My only point, and I think its quite clear to most people is that the use of the words sugar on a stick are not solely the property of one distribution (fedora) and ought not to be coupled with just one distribution. It should (and this has nothing to do with word policing of any kind, as funny as that remark might be) describe the medium by which sugar is delivered (a usb stick) Nowhere is there any mention of something distro specific, nor should there be. The term itself is great to describe what it is... and other distribution packagers are bound to use the same terms, since it quite rightly describes the end product. Just as Sugar on a CD describes very well that product. Like someone else suggested, if one chooses to brand sugar on a stick for Fedora, they can come up with a mirriad of names, lollypop being one of them...
I am actually quite surprised that this discussion is coming up on a mailing list that is very open source based. Taking ownership of a very generic term goes against the philosophy/politics of open source in general. Reminds me of the bbc's patent on urls... they were the first to use the term click on a link (and patenteted it).... Regards, David Van Assche <-- rest snipped for brevity --> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel