On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 06:40:37PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 3 Jul 2009, at 06:13, Aleksey Lim wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:06:30AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:53:42AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:25:54AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: >>>>> * additional types of filters >>>>> for example Library has[2] several types to filter objects >>>>> >>>>> * user tags >>>>> * object traits(additional columns from previous section) like >>>>> author, >>>>> genre, date for books >>>>> * activity creators(grouping by activity_id field) >>>>> * types of objects(like top section in filter palette)[3] >>>>> * filter by participants >>>>> * filter by sources(if we are in shared mode) >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure that all of these modes are useful, but something >>>>> could >>>>> be(or another types) >>>> >>>> like http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:-5.png >>> >>> use several types of view, list and cloud >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:-6.png >> >> I guess, having numbers of objects makes sense as well >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:-7.png > > Yes if that information is easily/quickly available some may find that > use full, it might be too much information clutter though. Likely more > useful for the tag cloud, though I'd rather tag font size be used for > immediate visual comparison. Tag cloud mock-up is still in progress, > it'll go up on the wiki page as soon as it's done.
yeah it was only for list view(of tags) cloud is all about font sizes instead of explicitly mentioned counts -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel