On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:17:13AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: > Hi all, > > One of lacks that sugar environment has is simple way to share sugar > objects for broad audience i.e. like scratch community has[1] > (thanks to davidmorris form #sugar). > > So, I've created [2]. Original idea was having highly integrated sharing > features into sugar shell but looks like we can do simple things first > and even utilize only Browse for browsing/download/upload sugar objects. > > The problem is - what web engine we should use. > > * Utilize AMO[3] engine which is used in activities.sugarlabs.org > in that case we can create something like library.sugarlabs.org to not
Pro: * we do not split users behaviour, they need the same experience that ASLO requires * one common branding for activities and objects sites * AMO has sufficient(imo) functionality - reviews, ranking, collections and thumbs mode https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:2/cat:all?sort=popular * we hack AMO code anyway - its not a problem in adding new AMO environment Contra: (?) -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel