C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Mathieu Bridon > (bochecha)<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 18:29, Luke Faraone<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:53, Aleksey Lim<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> One of sugar lacks is an easy way to send bugreports(especially for >>>> non-tech users), so if someone interested in please pick [1] up. >>> >>> From what I've seen on IRC, Sebastian Dziallas is currently working on a >>> solution, either by porting Apport to Sugar, using GNOME's bug-buddy, or the >>> Fedora bug reporter. (still in the investigative stage) > > FWIW, at my current company we: > a) use apport, tied to our internal bug tracker (fogbugz) -- it works > great. So apport++ in general, but it works best for *automatically > generated* bugs (ie, crashes). > b) We *also* have a very simple web-based bug reporter -- basically > it just opens a web site with a simple form on it. It should be > pretty trivial to make an activity based on Browse that just points to > a local html file which submits to bugzilla (or some other database). > I'd recommend using this to collect feedback which is not crashes. > --scott
Oh, that sounds cool! :) Yeah, as Luke said, I'm investigating both Ubuntu's Apport and Fedora's ABRT. However, I'm not yet sure if they'll fit our needs, so we might also end up with something web-based, yeah. /me hrms and wants to get this to work soonish... --Sebastian _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
