On 24.08.2009, at 10:09, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:00, Luke Faraone<l...@faraone.cc> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:07, Bernie Innocenti >> <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: >>> >>> I'd also like to propose using the URL http://trac.sugarlabs.org to >>> refer to our trac instance. The "dev." cname was appropriate when >>> trac >>> was supposed to be the central part of our development >>> infrastructure. >>> Now it would make more sense to use it for Gitorious, if at all. >> >> +1. dev.sl.o should be a "301 moved permanently" redirect for a few >> months >> though for the search engines + everyone else to recover.. > > I don't understand the reason for going through this hassle, so -1 > for now.
-1 to trac.sugarlabs.org too *If* a name change is desired then at least make it a generic one (like bugs.s.o), otherwise we have to change again should we decide to use a different tracker in a few years. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
