bill wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Bastien <bastiengue...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > > After a discussion with the FSF, they agreed the picture was not really > > appropriate and that the text should clearly distinguish OLPC from Sugar.
i'm confused. it's okay to smear olpc, but not sugar?? > > > > They will make an update - stay tuned. > > the picture is gone but the words are still there: > > > As a result, it is expected that the main effect of the OLPC project -- if > > it succeeds -- will be to turn millions of children into Microsoft > > dependents. That is a negative effect, to the point where the world would > > be > > better off if the OLPC project had never existed > > still over zealous, purist and FUD indeed. paul =--------------------- paul fox, p...@laptop.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel