On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:25 -0500, David Farning wrote: > Project/SIGs are product focused. The exist to help guide a project > through it's life cycle. For example, there has recently been some > rather heated discussions about working more closely with Qt. This is > an example of a idea the could start as a SIG and grow into a project > and be included in the Learning Platform.... if it proves useful.
Sorry to have not been involved in this conversation. So it sounds to me like Karma should be an SL SIG and later an SL Project. I really don't have an idea of how it will be governed but I will leave that to later as i see how the community around it develops. So I guess Karma can't progress from SIG to project until the leadership process is defined. I feel bad because I have been putting the SL logo on the karmaeducation.org site. Sorry if I was using the SL branding prematurely. I also put the SL logo in the Karma presentations. -- Bryan W. Berry Technology Director OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
