Peter Robinson wrote: > 2009/9/16 Philippe Clérié <phili...@gcal.net>: >> 1) You need a product to market. The comparison with Gnome does not hold. >> There have always been distributions that made Gnome their official desktop >> environment, even very early on. That is not the case for Sugar. Whether in >> Fedora, Debian or Ubuntu, Sugar will always be a secondary desktop at best. > > That is in fact completely incorrect. KDE is not the primary desktop > in Fedora but there is a team that makes it a first class Desktop in > Fedora.
OK. We just have a terminology problem on the definition of "distribution". Is Fedora 11 KDE Desktop Edition "a different distribution" from Fedora 11, or is it "the same distribution"? Is LUbuntu (LXDE Ubuntu) a different distribution from standard Ubuntu? The answer doesn't matter; it's just a definitions problem. Having an official "Fedora 12 Sugar Desktop Edition", making Sugar a first-class alternative to KDE and Gnome in Fedora, would be a great thing, and I suspect it would satisfy most of Philippe's concerns.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
