On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 19:45, Daniel Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/9/17 David Farning <[email protected]>: >> One step in that direction might be to clearly communicate and try to >> gather momentum around a series of stable releases. >> >> One thought that might work is to set .84, .88, .94, and 1.0 as stable >> releases for down streams to unite around. > > That would be useful but actually the critical area lacking resources > right now is people working on OS building and deployment > technologies. If I can tame your interest in getting new Sugar on XO > in a deployment-quality release, finding resources to work on these > resources would be the biggest help you could provide.
I personally think that making possible for XO-1 owners to upgrade to recent Sugar releases is very important for Sugar Labs, and if we are the only organization that can take this challenge, then we should do it. But if we decided to go for it, I see two fundamental pieces missing: - someone to coordinate the effort, - a team of people willing to test new images, file bug reports, help with triaging, etc. How can we get that? Maybe the OLPC Support Gang would like to get involved in this? People from existing deployments? Regards, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
