On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Martin Langhoff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Bernie Innocenti <[email protected]> wrote: >> Honestly? I think the most interesting feature of Zero Install is that >> it has an active development community working to solve the same hard >> problems that we are facing with our XO bundles. > > Ok - that's good. I am familiar with the limitations we are hitting > with rpm and dpkg. What I truly wonder about is things like > 'autopackage' and klik.
Autopackage was the one I'd seen before, but forgot the name. After ranting on this thread this morning, I ran across http://0install.net/matrix.html which contains a mini ZeroInstall take on the Autopackage and other options. rPath.com is from some of the old Red Hat guys doing RPM one better, making appliances, somewhere between build systems and git, etc, afaict... but personally, I'm still stuck on the older hardware doesn't boot from usb, and cdr isos are very slow by comparison (a young person was complaining (some) when XO hardware was taken away and replaced with a sugar cdr on a regular laptop in the USA...). -- DancesWithCars leave the wolves behind ;-) _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
