On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:19:15AM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > I have no experience with Launchpad, but am often frustrated by the > performance of SL Trac.
I've experience with both Launchpad and OLPC Trac, and I'm not finding any difficulties with either. (I use Launchpad for Netrek). The lack of e-mail integration in OLPC Trac is a comparative disadvantage in a large community, but at the moment OLPC Trac is focused on XO-1.5 development with a small community, and so the demand for e-mail integration is reduced. > Any chance OLPC would consider moving over too, so we could have true > connections between OLPC and SL bugs? Yes, OLPC may consider this, but in my view only after the XO-1.5 cycle ... the workflow is different to how Launchpad works, and changing now would be high risk. OLPC Trac also does not suffer unduly from automated attacks. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel