On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Hi, > > as a follow up on an older thread: > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-October/019939.html > - we want to get the versioning sorted in 0.88 for real. So far we came > up with these three options: > > a) The release cycle dependent one: Activities name their activity after > the Sugar version they are developed against. If it was released during > the 0.88 cycle and developed against 0.88, then it would be 0.88.x.
Most of activities are compatible with several release cycles, so using SP in activity versions adds only confusing > b) MAJOR.MINOR (x.y): The new Browse activity for 0.88 would be 115.0. > Fixes would go into 115.1, 115.2... > > c) MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (x.y.z) The new Browse activity for 0.88 would be > 115.0.0. Fixes would go into 115.1.0, 115.2.1... > > What do people like best? > > Thanks, > Simon > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
