On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 23:44, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:09:16PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> If the method suggested by Sebastian fails due to nasty dependencies,
>> I'd be glad to backport the 0.86 or 0.87 packages to F11 for testers
>> like you.
>>
>> Hopefully it won't take much time, just let me know if it's needed.
>
> It did indeed fail due to nasty dependencies and so I stopped
> investigation. If you do what you suggest, then I'm more likely to
> test.
>
> My main reason for testing is part of diagnosis of the 0.84 problems
> encountered ... if I can test 0.86 or 0.87 and say "this is fixed", then
> that opens up the possibility of either backporting the fix or closing
> the ticket as "solved in a later release".
>
> There is a useful side effect of testing 0.86 or 0.87, but don't
> *expect* this to occur from me until we start using those versions in a
> build. ;-}
You could also try installing what will soon become Fedora 13 Alpha:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/13-Alpha.TC2/Fedora/i386/iso/
----------
Mathieu Bridon
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
