On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:04, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > G'day, > > The sugar-launch [0] utility used to accept a brief activity name, such as > Maze. It was changed [1] to require a bundle id, such as vu.lux.olpc.Maze. > > This is less easy to use [2]. > > Can we discuss whether a brief activity name can be used instead or as > well as a bundle id?
Sure, I think this is a bug and the older behavior was correct. Do we have a patch already? Regards, Tomeu > References: > > 0. > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/master/bin/sugar-launch > > 1. > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/commits/b36db6599ed59412ce77c8ed4fb1dea782877a62 > > 2. > http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/897 > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
