Aleksey Lim wrote: > agree as well, my thought about requesting SLOBs is that there is a fork: > > * only SP activities > * activities w/ non SP dependencies > > and would be very useful (for everyone) if we explicitly follow one > particular thread.
I agree. Personally, I would be comfortable with a policy like: """ In order for a .xo bundle to be marked Public on ASLO, it must depend only on the Sugar Platform. It must not require the installation of any additional software, or depend on a particular Linux distribution or CPU architecture. Activities that have already been marked Public will remain so marked to avoid disruption. Activity authors are welcome to upload new Activities with other dependencies, but they will be marked Experimental. Activity authors are discouraged from adding new dependencies to Activities that have already been marked Public. We intend to produce a well-supported system for distributing Activities that depend on software outside the Sugar Platform. Once this system is in place, Activities that use it may be marked Public on ASLO. """ What do other people think? --Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
