On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: >> Hi Walter (and others). >> >> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:07:55PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:32:59PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:35:20PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0.88 is the latest version of Sugar, consisting of Glucose, the base >>>>>>> system environment; and Fructose, a set of demonstration activities. >>>>>>> This >>>>>>> new release contains many new features, performance and code >>>>>>> improvements, >>>>>>> bug fixes, and translations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Congratulations to all involved! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry to ask - again: Where is the official documented list of contents >>>>>> of Glucose and Fructose for each major release of Sugar? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I fail to locate it at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.88/Notes and the >>>>>> directly referenced http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy is too broad. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to check - for each of 0.84, 0.86 and 0.88 - how close to >>>>>> the official compositions we are in Debian currently. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please do not post the detailed answer in an email response, but refer >>>>>> to the wiki page which is (supposed to) contain this info. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Its not changed for quite some time and can be found here: >>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Modules >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> It seems that page is not exactly what I am looking for, however. >>>> >>>> Or let me try throw a couple of trick questions: >>> >>> Risking getting tripped up... >> >> :-) >> >> >>>> * Do newest release of Browse work on 0.84? >>> >>> I believe the answer is yes. >> >> Specifically for 0.84 I believe that some activities only supports the >> "redesigned toolbar", and judging from its Git source branching Browse is >> one of those. > > Hmm. I was pretty sure that Browse had support for both styles of > toolbars. But apparently I am mistaken. As Peter mentioned, the > database in ASLO keeps track of which versions of which activities go > with the various Sucrose releases. I suppose those data should be in > the wiki somewhere as well, at least for Fructose.
Checking ASLO, Browse 112 is marked as working with 0.86; Browse 108 is marked as working with 0.84. -walter >> >> There might be other issues too, and the issue might have been fixed later >> on so that the 0.84 branch is no longer used so is a wrong measure for me as >> distributor to look for. >> >> I have been around long enough to have heard about it when the toolbar was >> redesigned, so am aware of that particular issue. But others might not - >> and I would appreciate not having to rely on my own jusgement and code >> analysis but being able to lookup hard facts published by the upstream >> project. >> >> >>>> * Is (newest releases of) jukebox and imageviewer part of 0.84? >>> >>> The maintainers of 0.84 would have to answer this question. They are >>> doing quite a bit of backporting. >> >> The question here was not if it _works_ with 0.84, but instead if it is >> considered as _part_ of the "core" Sugar environment. So when you mention >> backporting efforts, I suspect that we are not talking about the same thing >> - or perhaps your use of "backporting" is what I would call "deriving". > > I mean backporting in the sense that they are taking a number of > patches made for 0.88 and applying them to 0.84. So the definition of > "core" Sugar for 0.84 is a bit of a moving target. Not being a distro > person, I can only imagine that leading to some confusion, but for the > most part, the backporting is confined to strategic bug fixes as > opposed to redefinitions of components. There is a particular focus on > 0.84 because it is being rolled out on the new OLPC hardware and in > many of the larger Sugar deployments. > >> Sigh... I know that mentioning "core Sugar" might spawn a discussion on its >> own. :-/ >> >> >>>> If you do not care about tracking 0.84 any longer then what revision of >>>> which wiki page should I go look for latest info on that abandoned release? >>> >>> 0.84 has not been abandoned. There are several teams working on its >>> maintenance and support. >> >> Yeah, that's my impression too. Thanks for reassuring that my big efforts >> on multi-branched packaging for Debian is not a total waste :-) >> >> >> - Jonas >> >> -- >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ >> >> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJLtNsxAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhUcgP/2oTYG50FTqMXDL+7DsbrVJ/ >> dU3Z58N0fA4HCHhN9pilKDCVujUvRGd6c03fOXc0FnjDCYPJ/ACl4lYZmRMoG04F >> LCR70n7UlVPyA8sEhCegY/OvxxmP6+RlOnzpLZrA+N3HknvXRY0shsU1eSv5oUMY >> d8jqvJyu5F45sE7+PfWXqcxGodUdTF2u0BwyV+/Jq8S2DJ1fDa58TRdcmYdcIRsD >> xuIF5n366V0PdDp8/Q9LsAIwytS5AISvurxYLBrY8uqTgJ4VZL2bcLA1BM3imstB >> Ccs7WpVcx0UhQsokyvFnSoK74yedjTBUqTq3IaMd15euZbzN3ok5CZraLQPOGr60 >> tXJVHz+jqFL2EnYqhd3qytV8Jzcrb96vvLVBaPqqhuxAJMM3nZaiW7yIwJwqc2+0 >> bxsMQIS5WsK3LOkgKadfOTNickGF5m9u3Xnu1R5tKefA2hzjT1OJkQqkATAmyuIu >> wZZ2F5o/tfI6BCP6qE337+0ptdqyQZXeMs9r3jxTaNyt2kwT9TrONsbtshnP/4TB >> KKKOr9Y0xH1n/s1I+hE7gCkNVEhTWooGllq0JuP/8e0Z64g0gTDGRYywXoAbwdQ7 >> mQ9HeeTvTYbgYJ2IAKFcLqSOGFtuktWGf8tG2sBj/hnZISpK89xhak1SuPXfj+ml >> lQldiCk1b4SugeYa6H5o >> =7FYH >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel