On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:17:32AM +0000, Sascha Silbe wrote: > While you're at it, can you avoid the escaping by using different > quotes and replace "%" with "," (for consistency with our style > guidelines - it doesn't really make a difference in this particular > case), please?
Heh. Sure. Tell me where your style guidelines are? Diversion. What we're missing from the process at the moment is the people who apply the patches are supposed to say so as a reply to the thread. Either nobody is applying these reviewed patches, or those who are applying them are not saying so. ;-} I mention that because it's the sort of thing that I'd expect you as a committer to the repository to have handled yourself rather than write a reply about it. I presume you were terribly busy and couldn't afford the time. Or is there something about the process I'm not understanding? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
