2010/6/9 Luke Faraone <l...@faraone.cc> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > > As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet, > > so it's not like we need to keep it around for API compatibility. > > Actually, hulahop is used by pyjamas[1], as evidenced by these bug > reports[2][3] spawned when sugar-hulahop was removed from Ubuntu Lucid. > An aside, according to upstream this is not an integral part of their > project, but it might be a good idea to involve them in the discussion. >
These days, I do my work in pyjamas - on the cloud. I have never used pyjamas on the desktop, but for people who do, hulahoop* was the least painful way to get there, and its removal sparked indignation. *OK, it's called hulahop, but this way all the code names mesh more surreally. Seriously, though: the fact that pyjamas-desktop can exist without hulahop doesn't make it attractive to lose it. It may not be integral, but I don't see anybody in the pyjamas world who would be replacing it any time soon, so it is essential as a practical matter. Jameson
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
