On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > El Sun, 13-06-2010 a las 20:55 +0100, Gary C Martin escribió: >> OK, not strictly a patch but attached is an updated version of >> the currently malformed svg module-updater icon that's not >> drawing correctly in F13. Not sure who this needs to get to > >> (could only find it in Bernie's old depreciated software >> update git rep). It should live in the filesystem at: >> >> /usr/share/sugar/data/icons/module-updater.svg > > There are two updaters: the old one written by C.Scott, which is the one > in my obsolete repo and Fedora packages, and a new one written from > scratch by DFarning for ASLO, which lives in the sugar repository.
To give credit where credit is due, the ASLO updater is just a update of Scott's code to parse the xml ASLO dynamically creates rather than micoroformat. david > For the F11-0.88, we have a dilemma: the new updater is missing some > crucial features that deployments were relying upon. What missing features are important? david > Daniel Drake and I discussed possible solutions when he visited > Paraguay. There are two equally acceptable possibilities: > > 1) is adding the missing features to the new codebase, which shouldn't > be too hard but needs someone to do it by mid-July maximum. Anyone > available? > > 2) The other possibility is adding the OLPC microformat support to ASLO > and reverting to the old updater, which would mean less developer time > but reintroduces the dependency on bitfrost which we'd rather keep away > from the Sugar codebase. > > Or even a combination of the two. The new query protocol is very slow, > so we might want to teach ASLO about the microformat anyway. When I > checked the php code with Daniel, it seemed very easy to do. > > Alsroot and I discussed the possibility to add .xol support to ASLO. > While we agree that ASLO isn't a very good fit for static content, we're > going to support .xol for the utilitarian purpose of making the updater > work in F11-0.88. > > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel