On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:02:57PM -0500, David Farning wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 18:39, David Farning <dfarn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Over the past couple of months it has appeared that the ramp up of > >> deployment submitted patches has stretched the core maintainers rather > >> short. > >> > >> I would like to consider having Deployment Support Network developers > >> start accepting additional maintainership responsibility and > >> authority. Specifically, I am interested in which core activities are > >> in need of a maintainer and which core modules are up for adoption. > >> > >> With this information, I can start identifying and recruiting > >> potential maintainers. > > > > From my POV, in order of need/suitability: > > > > - Read > > - Write > > AC will accept responsibility for Read and Write.
Please update http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Modules then. It'd also be nice to know who the people are and why they are qualified (code patches seem a good way to do this, as implied by http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-June/024616.html ). > david Martin
pgpBLIDxrtf7d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
