I was planning to simply pretend that Browse-webkit is a newer version of Surf. In a way it is, since they share some ancient git history :)
So unless Bobby minds us using Surf's brand, we shouldn't need a new icon. Thanks for offering, though. On 22 July 2010 18:54, Gary Martin <garycmar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 22 Jul 2010, at 17:26, Lucian Branescu <lucian.brane...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If bobbyp agrees, I'll rebrand it to Surf until it gets merged to >> master. Would that be ok? > > Need a new svg icon, temp or otherwise? Happy to cook something up, similar > to the old surf svg involving a breaking wave (I'd go for open circle inside > breaking roller, rather than a circle with a roller inside). > > Regards, > --Gary > >> On 22 July 2010 17:24, Benjamin M. Schwartz <bmsch...@fas.harvard.edu> wrote: >>> On 07/22/2010 12:18 PM, Lucian Branescu wrote: >>>> In order to better test Browse-webkit, we'd need to package and distribute >>>> it. >>> >>> If it isn't heavily tested and known to work perfectly, definitely don't >>> call it "Browse", and definitely don't use the same icon. Browse is by >>> far the #1 most important activity, so we cannot accept _any_ regressions. >>> >>> --Ben >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel