On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:14, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:57:49PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: >> BTW, it would be nice if patch submitters would update the state of their >> own patches on patchwork [1], especially if they get superseded by newer >> patch versions or accepted into mainline. >> This is entirely optional, but helps reducing the load on maintainers. > > Neat. Didn't know I could do that. > > Advice for others: get an account if you don't have one yet, log in, > look in the patches list, identify those that are superceded, click on > them, update the state and optionally click on archived, then update.
Just did it for the patches I submitted, if others could do the same would be great. Thanks, Tomeu > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
