On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 21:05, Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org> wrote: > Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Mon Oct 04 19:48:36 +0200 2010: > >> Can submitters reply to their own messages for those that are intended >> to go in before we branch? > > This patch of mine is a bug fix and should go into 0.90.1: > > [sugar] fix recognition of JEBs outside of data store [1] > > These patches fix breakages on a HAL-free system (does F14 still ship > HAL?): > > [sugar] battery frame device: replace HAL with UPower [2] > [Read] don't break if HAL is not available [3]
We don't have tickets for any of these? I think at this point we should be still focusing on fixing regressions. If they are enhancements or fixes for things that had already been broken, then I think they could land in 0.90 just after we make the first bugfix release. > If you'd like I can bump the threads, but maybe you like Patchwork > even better. ;) Actually, the value I saw in Patchwork was submitters (and others) helping me manage my queue by assigning me patches to review, but that doesn't seem going to happen :( Regards, Tomeu > All other patches I posted are for 0.92. > > Sascha > > [1] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/169/ > [2] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/134/ > [3] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/27/ > > -- > http://sascha.silbe.org/ > http://www.infra-silbe.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel