On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:56:41PM +0100, Gary Martin wrote: > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/paint/repos/mainline > > I noticed that the activity.info file is still for version 27. As > Paint-28 has been released I'd expect to mainline to at least be up to > date with those commits. Maybe the rest of the source is current, and > it's just the activity.info file change that was not pushed?
While it would be nice if every release of every activity has a matching tag and sources in the respective repository, we've had situations where that has not been desirable, such as when a version of Record was released for a deployment via activities.sugarlabs.org but the changes were not accepted into mainline because consensus had not been reached. A release of an activity is not done using the master repository, it is done using a local clone of the repository. Therefore during testing and diagnosis I've always presumed that the source code shipped in the .xo file might be different to the tagged source in the master repository. I'm happy with the current situation, and it is a good learning experience for people who might think that there is more rigour. However, if this needs fixing, then whomever released Paint-28 might merge their changes into the repository ... or if they are unavailable to do this then one of us could take the Paint-28 sources from the .xo and merge them. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel