On 10/17/2010 07:15 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: > I'm assuming the infrastructure team are part of this list.
We are, sorry for the long reply time. > The archives are easily searchable, attached files are converted to links to > the server so that people's inboxes are not flooded. Removing inline attachments may break PGP/MIME, (although I haven't checked) and some people consider being able to read a message offline in its entirety a feature. I hope that behavior is configurable. > I welcome any feedback. I think that a migration like this will make the > mailing lists far more accessible as a knowledge archive. I've been assured > that there is a migration path from mailman[4]. From what I know of Dan, its > lead developer, it should be fairly easy & reliable. I'll take a look at it. For it to be seriously considered, a mailman path would be needed. The linked tweet notwithstanding, I've not seen any documentation on such a migration. -- ╒═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╕ │Luke Faraone ╭Debian / Ubuntu Developer╮│ │http://luke.faraone.cc ╰Sugar Labs, Systems Admin╯│ │PGP: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506 │ ╘═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╛
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel