On 10/22/2010 07:00 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 10/07/2010 06:39 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 4 October 2010 15:27, Gonzalo Odiard<gonz...@laptop.org> wrote:
What do others think about this approach? Packagers?
A clearer way to discuss this would be to just send a patch. That way
there is no doubt over the details of the implementation that you are
proposing.
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
that is what the current implementation looks like:
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/2425/normalized_version.patch
Hope this helps,
Simon
I have been giving the patches another go and made some smaller fixes
for error handling. I have tested them as well to make sure there are no
regressions. I give them my ok.
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/2425/0001-Adopt-to-new-numbering-scheme-2425.patch
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/2425/0001-Add-new-numbering-scheme-2425.patch
Comments?
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
