On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:49:01PM +0530, Anurag Chowdhury wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Martin Dengler <mar...@martindengler.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:05:16PM +0530, Anurag Chowdhury wrote: > >> Sure , we can work to get a combined patch but your patch still > >> disables the animation in most of the icons > > > > I think you're talking about something else than my patch. No > > animation is disabled. Not sure what's wrong but the patch you linked > > to[1] in your wiki page clearly does nothing like disabling any > > animation. > Well, I actually didn't meant that. I was talking about the change > noticed by Gary (and me too) i.e. after the application of the patch > we don't get to see the pulsing icon animation in most of the icons , > all we see is only the grayscale svg icon , this anomaly is also > linked with the complexity of the icons i.e. more complex icons don't > show up the animation while the simpler ones do.
Are you talking about the pulsing from greyscale to color, or the zooming? Gary was talking about the zooming[1] IIUC, and that is obviously not changed by my patch. I understood his comment to mean that there was already a zooming issue in the build he was referring to, and that my patch did not change that. Can you please help me understand a bit more why you think my patch causes the pulsing icon to not show in color? I don't see that in my sugar-jhbuild before or after my patch. Martin 1. http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-October/028444.html
pgptiHCsoKp3T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel