On 24 June 2011 14:10, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > On 24 June 2011 13:08, Lucian Branescu <lucian.brane...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just nitpicking, but gtk2/pygi is a perfectly good option as well, and >> it may even work with sugar-toolkit (depending on the status of >> python-gobject and sugar-toolkit). > > According to a conversation I had with Tomeu and J5 (pygi developers), > pygi introspection to gtk2 libraries does not work well and is > unsupported. Also, mixing pygi with pygtk is impossible and will fall > over immediately. According to them, pure gtk3 is the only solution.
Hmm, that's quite different from my last talk with them. I was told that gtk2 is fine and that since py-gi is based on pygobject, there's a chance it might work with pygtk2. Not having gtk2 support is quite nasty, and it changes a lot of plans. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel