On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote: > El 21/11/11 13:29, Walter Bender escribió: >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Simon Schampijer<si...@schampijer.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> just a quick reminder that today is the deadline for proposing Features >>> for >>> the 0.96 development cycle [1]. >>> >>> The currently proposed and accepted Features can be seen here [2]. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.96/Roadmap >>> [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.96/Feature_List >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >> >> Simon, >> >> Maybe I have misunderstood the process or made a mistake along the >> line, but I had many other features proposed for 0.96 than showed up >> in your list [2 above]. > > There is a difference between proposing a Feature (mainly creating the page) > [1] and proposing it for the release cycle [2]. I did create my list from > skimming through the mails that had the '[FEATURE]' tag in it.
Could we please make the latter requirement (posting email with a [FEATURE] tag more prominent? I still cannot find it in the documentation. I'll post my proposals to the list. Thanks. (Gonzalo: You have a few unacknowledged proposals as well.) -walter > >> >> [3] >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Activity_specific_metadata_in_Journal >> [4] >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Journal_Volume_Toolbar_enhancement >> [5] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view >> [6] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views >> >> and dusted off from the past: >> >> [7] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Write_to_journal_anytime >> (this is the only one that made your list) >> [8] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Thumbs_View_in_Journal >> >> How do I get these proposals considered? >> >> regards. >> >> -walter > > Wow, those are quite a few, the list will get long quickly. Of course I will > not discourage someone from working on something and as long as a Feature > follows the Policy [3] it is considered for the development cycle, but I am > a bit skeptical if we can achieve all those features in the next cycle, for > the following reasons: > > * besides writing the code a Feature might have impacts on the workflow and > needs design discussions > > * the code has to be reviewed > > * we need to test it as well etc > > * we have the gtk3 work ahead of us > > So I would propose to talk a bit about what is doable in the development > team meeting tomorrow. And if we find agreement that we maybe focus on some > items. And yes, it is great to have a pool of items we can choose from, > schedule wise we are still in that phase. > > Regards, > Simon > > [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy#Propose_a_feature > [2] > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy#Propose_a_feature_for_addition_into_the_release_cycle > [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel