On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 03:01:17PM +0800, Xin Wang wrote: >> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 02:19:08PM +0800, Xin Wang wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: >> >> > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:47:03PM +0800, Xin Wang wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> >> >> Recently I'm trying to package sugar for openSUSE. Glucose packages >> >> >> have finished, and now I'm packaging Browse. But it failed to start >> >> >> with following error. >> >> > >> >> > btw, do you package Sugar for official repos or in of OBS projects? >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Aleksey >> >> >> >> I'm packaging in OBS for now. >> >> >> >> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=home%3Adramwang%3Asugar >> >> >> >> When everything is mature, I will submit a request for merge into >> >> official repo. >> > >> > I'm asking because there are outdated X11:Sugar and X11:Sugar:Unstable >> > OBS projects. afaik, they existed as a standalone projects all time >> > (you can ping cyberorg on #opensuse-edu channel on freenode, I was >> > working with him when I was populating these projects). >> > >> > Also, you can consider contributing to Sweets Distributoin[1] which >> > exists on Sugar Labs instance of OBS on packages.sugarlabs.org. >> > Right now, Sweets Distributoin support Ubuntu and stable OLCP OS >> > (Fedora-14 based). The reasons to have Sweets Distributoin (in comparing >> > with Sugar in official packages) are: >> > >> > * it is not all time possible to package new Sugar versions to already >> > released official repos (afaik, only Debian/Ubuntu does it) >> > >> > * having standalone repos, there is a benefit to package (Sweets >> > Distributoin places it to /opt directory to not interfere w/ official >> > packages) some packages with different build flags (like building >> > telepathy-mission-control w/o keyring support, which is not used in >> > Sugar) or different versions (if there is a problem w/ versions in >> > official packages, like xulrunner-1.9 for gtk2 based Browse). >> > >> > * we have the same Sugar version on all supported platforms[2] that should >> > simplify supporting (not that people on Fedora have the recent one, >> > and older Sugar on distros that is not well supported by packagers) >> > >> > >> > [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sweets_Distribution >> > >> > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Platform_Team/Harmonic_Distribution/Supported_platforms >> > >> > -- >> > Aleksey >> >> Thanks a lot, I will have a look at it. >> >> I'm planning to use susestudio to make a openSUSE LiveCD with sugar. >> >> I'm not sure if susestudio can use packages in Sweets Distribution directly? > > Sweets Distribution is being built w/ OBS (SL instance). AFAIK, OBS > supports linking repos from another OBS instances. If it is possible, you > can link Sweets Distribution repo from packages.sl.o to susestudio. > > -- > Aleksey
OK, I'll have a try. -- Xin Wang (http://dram.me/) _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel