>> is that 1.0? or do we call it 0.100 1.0 !
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 07:35:54 +0200 > From: si...@schampijer.de > To: Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: [Sugar-devel] 0.98 Schedule proposal > > Hi, > > I have been drafting the schedule for the 0.98 release [1]. We are a > bit late in defining it but things have been in flux for a while. We > normally follow the GNOME schedule and release every six months. This > time those of us at OLPC have ambitious goals: > > - port the shell to GTK+ 3 and PyGobject/gobject-introspection > - make Sugar usable with touch devices such as the upcoming XO-4 touch > > And I think these 0.98 goals are also shared by other key contributors > outside of the direct OLPC umbrella. > > To make this possible we would need to extend the 0.98 schedule this > time and align with the OLPC one for the upcoming 12.2.0 release [2]. > Releasing in September (i.e. following the GNOME schedule) would just > be too soon to meet the above goals, furthermore it would involve > freezing in less than 2 weeks time (we wouldn't be able to achieve > much at all). > > Of course there are more Sugar users than the OLPC ones but it is by > far the largest user group and this is a big opportunity to bring > Sugar itself to the next level, having it ready for touch! So we > better take it. > > For the next Sugar release (is that 1.0? or do we call it 0.100 :) we > can go back to the normal schedule and align again with the GNOME > schedule. > > Regards, > Simon > > [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.98/Roadmap#Schedule > [2] http://wiki.laptop.org/go/12.2.0/Release_plan > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel