On 2012-08-22, at 04:27, Martin Abente wrote: > Hello everyone: > > From the meeting notes and Bert suggestion I have what could be called the > version 2 of this feature, greatly simplified and complies with everyones > rightful suggestions. > > To avoid spaming (for some time) the sugar-devel ML I will post the patches > just here: > > sugar: > http://www.sugarlabs.org/~tch/patches/examples/sugar/0001-Examples-objects-support-V2.patch > sugar-toolkit: > http://www.sugarlabs.org/~tch/patches/examples/sugar-toolkit/0001-Examples_path-activity-info.patch > > Feedback is welcome! > tch
I have not tried it, but by eyeballing the code looks fine :) - Bert - > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Martin Abente > <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see why not, we can achieve both things :). Maybe someone have > another opinion regarding this? > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > On 2012-08-21, at 20:17, Martin Abente wrote: > > > The design I implemented works like this: > > > > a. activity developers or deployments add a new "examples" folder inside > > the activity bundle with their examples objects. > > b. when the activity starts, the example folder will be accessible through > > the journal as new volume option, and also from __any__ ObjectChooser. > > c. Only one volume button will be shown, even when many instances of the > > activity are running. > > d. The example folder will disappear from the journal when the last > > instance is closed. > > [...] > > Waiting for more feedback... :) > > And in another thread: > > >> instead of a magic directory name, couldn't the activity.info file have a > >> new entry giving the examples path? > > > > > What I tried, or I am trying, to do is to make this feature available as > > easy as we can, so even deployments could add their own examples with very > > little technical knowledge requirements. That why I try this convention > > (magical) idea. > > > Okay, so by default it should look for a directory named "examples". But > maybe a different path could be set in activity.info? > > - Bert - > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
