Are you talking about that Sugar-build isn't going to build anymore sugar-toolkit-gtk2? The Gtk2 environment/dependencies are generally pre-installed on standard systems. Not in mini-distros, but it's not the case of Fedora and Ubuntu. I agree in that a build from sources isn't appropiated when nobody needs to contribute on it. But rmp/deb packages are all what we need to run activities in Gtk2. Maybe any packager could tell us about a place to get them.
Cheers. ~danielf 2012/11/16 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>: > Yeah. To be clear this affects sugar-build *only*. Distributions will keep > shipping the gtk2 stuff as far as I know. > > > On Friday, 16 November 2012, Walter Bender wrote: >> >> So the idea is that gtk2 apps won't run any more? >> >> -walter >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I'm planning to drop gtk2 support and I'm giving a warning about it in >> > advance, in case someone has concerns about it. I just think >> > sugar-build is a development tool and no one should be developing on >> > gtk2 anymore... (if not for minimal maintenance stuff, but that >> > doesn't probably need sugar-build). >> > >> > -- >> > Daniel Narvaez >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Sugar-devel mailing list >> > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> >> -- >> Walter Bender >> Sugar Labs >> http://www.sugarlabs.org > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel