On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yes.. the small first :-) > > Maybe I lose the discussion: why 0.100 instead 1.00 ? > > The short story is we don't feel ready for 1.0. While can sound strange Sugar has not reached 1.0, with 2M users and years of development, we expected do a API cleanup before announce the mythical 1.0 number, and in this cycle, this is difficult due to resources concerns. Gonzalo > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:13:10 -0300 > From: gonz...@laptop.org > To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; alsr...@activitycentral.org > Subject: [Sugar-devel] New default values for compatibility in ASLO > > > Trying to add a new activity version in ASLO, the default values for Sugar > versions > are now 0.100 - 0.98. > > I think should be 0.98 - 0.100, right? > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel