Hey Manuel, On 11 May 2013, at 00:47, Manuel Quiñones <ma...@laptop.org> wrote:
> Oh, we should release it then. Can you, Gary? Yes but need to fix the 'drag hands' bugs – can't have it reading out occasional incorrect times to kids due to lack of precision/rounding errors ;) Lets see if I can make progress this weekend and make a release. Regards, --Gary > 2013/5/10 James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org>: >> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:55:51AM +1000, James Cameron wrote: >>> Summary: this Clock activity consumes significantly less CPU on XO-4 >>> and XO-1 when implemented in Javascript. >> >> Myth busted. See new results in context below. >> >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:42:18PM -0300, Manuel Qui?ones wrote: >>>> 2013/4/30 James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org>: >>>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:58:50AM -0300, Manuel Qui?ones wrote: >>>>>> Should work on other browsers now: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://manuq.github.io/clockjs/ >>>>> >>>>> Agreed, works well, reasonably low CPU utilisation. Thanks. >>>> >>>> Excellent. Thanks for checking the CPU consumption. >>> >>> Here's a more detailed check. Method is to run only the activity >>> under test, and use the serial port to run the Linux top command >>> configured for a 30 second sample time. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> On XO-4 using 13.1.0: >>> >>> - using Javascript, the Browse-149 process consumes 7.5% CPU, and the >>> X process 3.2% CPU. Total of 10.7% CPU. >>> >>> - not using Javascript, the Clock-12 process consumes 2.7% CPU, and >>> the X process 13.2% CPU. Total of 15.9% CPU. >> >> Clock-12.5 process consumes 0.6%, and the X process 2.0%, a total of >> 2.6%. >> >>> -- >>> >>> On XO-1 using 13.2.0, build 32004o0, >>> >>> - using Javascript, the Browse-149.2 process consumes 9.8%, the X >>> process 7.4%, a total of 17.2%, >>> >>> - not using Javascript, the Clock-12 process consumes 10.4% and X >>> process consumes 18.4%, a total of 30.8%. >> >> Clock-12.5 process consumes 1.5%, and the X process 3.6%, a total of >> 5.1%. >> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> On XO-1 using 11.3.0, build 883, >>> >>> - using Javascript, the Browse 129.1 does not render the script, >>> >>> - not using Javascript, the Clock-6 consumes 7.0%, and X consumed >>> 9.0%, a total of 16%. >> >> Test not repeated. >> >> -- >> James Cameron >> http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > > > > -- > .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel