Actually maybe on -testing, -devel seems for trunk.
On 29 June 2013 14:12, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could you add me to sugartrac? I'll give it a try on -devel and see if > there are blockers. > > > On 29 June 2013 13:36, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > >> On 06/28/2013 06:57 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > we seem to have a pretty old trac version. I'm trying to improve sugar >> > core bug tracking state and practices and as part of that effort I think >> > it might make sense to upgrade to 1.0. >> >> That would be great. >> >> >> > Is the only reason we didn't upgrade so far lack of time? Or do we know >> > about blockers? >> >> Trac probably needs a new maintainer. Would you like to take it over or >> replace it with something else? >> >> >> > Is our trac configuration somewhere? I didn't find it in git. >> >> The only documentation we have on Trac is this page: >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Service/bugs >> >> The production instance is located on sunjammer, in >> /srv/www-sugarlabs/bugs. There's also a development environment in >> bugs-devel which is accessible as http://bugs-devel.sugarlabs.org/ >> >> Before touching the production instance, you might want to try upgrading >> the -devel environment to see how it goes. >> >> Ping me on IRC if you need any help. I have vague memories of upgrading >> Trac several years ago (hint: it's quite painful). >> >> -- >> _ // Bernie Innocenti >> \X/ http://codewiz.org >> > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel