The spec is here, really: https://github.com/manuq/oop-js/blob/master/spec/SuperHeroSpec.js
2013/7/24 Manuel Quiñones <[email protected]>: > The test runner is here: http://manuq.github.io/oop-js/ > > 2013/7/24 Manuel Quiñones <[email protected]>: >> Hi, >> >> I'm looking the best way to do OOP in JavaScript, which we need in >> sugar-web. I don't mind not doing classical OOP. I think we should >> aim to do what suits better the JavaScript language: Prototypal >> Inheritance. >> >> Here is Mozilla documentation: >> >> - >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Inheritance_and_the_prototype_chain >> - >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Guide/Inheritance_Revisited >> >> The first article gives an introduction of prototypes. The latter >> gives a real example of inheritance. >> >> There is also another option, using a helper like stated in: >> >> - http://stackoverflow.com/a/4389429/1178541 >> >> I have tried both in a git repo with testscases. Here is the spec: >> >> - https://github.com/manuq/oop-js/blob/master/src/SuperHero.js >> >> And here are the two implementations: >> >> - https://github.com/manuq/oop-js/blob/master/src/SuperHero.js >> - https://github.com/manuq/oop-js/blob/master/src/SuperHeroWithHelper.js >> >> Now I think the option without helper is better. Although it seems a >> bit more verbose and nested. Thoughts? Any other options? >> >> >> -- >> .. manuq .. > > > > -- > .. manuq .. -- .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
