HI,
I suspect a 10 line python script could update activity-info.
It may be time to have two versions of each activity in ASLO. One
compatible
with 0.82 and the other with 0.100.
Keeping in mind that 0.82 < 0.100.
Tony
On 10/30/2013 05:04 PM, sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:03:58 +1100
From: James Cameron<qu...@laptop.org>
To:sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
Message-ID:<20131030210358.gd20...@us.netrek.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:27:57PM -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>What you think about include it ?in Sugar??
Yes, include it.
It has no effect unless it is necessary. (Small functional footprint).
It fixes an unnecessary incompatibility.
I have seen no significant evidence for excluding the change.
If upstream is unwilling, then downstream may include it in packaging.
-- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
