On 1 November 2013 02:18, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 1 Bug fixes. In 0.100 we added several nice features but I think the > >> > quality > >> > of the core components is still not at a level we can be proud of. > Let's > >> > try > >> > to fix that for 0.102. > >> > >> Be nice to get a discussion going about where you see the problems. > > > > > > Do you mean the concrete quality issues I'm seeing or the problems with > the > > development process keeping quality low? > > > > Both. > Ok. I will try to start a discussion. I need to put more thought into this myself first... > I remember someone wasn't happy about the features proposal process. Maybe > it was you but I'm not sure... Anyway that's something we can discuss now. I > must admit I'm not even very familiar with feature pages requirements. As > far as I'm concerned just explaining what you are planning to land on the > mailing list would be enough. Not sure there is too much more overhead for writing a wiki page vs > writing an email. I don't recall hearing anything concrete about the > feature proposal process recently. It has be refactored periodically, > usually under the guidance of the release manager :) > Yeah it wasn't much about wiki vs mailing list but I guessed there was formal requirements for what a feature proposal should look like etc. And I hate formalities :) I never wrote a feature proposal myself... I thought I heard someone complain in irc, but if people are happy I'm happy too!
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel