On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: > Thanks Martin, good job. > looking forward to work with you in this topic. > I have added a few comments.
Me too. > > Gonzalo > > PS: Probably I will not be available the next two days Me too. BTW, started writing up some notes on the new features for testing [1]. We need to write up how to do that testing. -walter [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Testing#New_features_to_test > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Martin Abente > <martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello Gonzalo, >> >> I created this wiki page with some RAW thoughts about things we can >> consider for improving [1]. >> >> Saludos, >> tch >> >> Refs: >> 1. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Backup_and_Restore/Enhancements >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> One of the features we want upstream is Backup/Restore of the Journal. >>> >>> There are already a page for this feature [1] but the currently only >>> is implemented >>> the backup/restore to a connected device (pen drive), and not to/from >>> the school server. >>> >>> I did the port to Sugar 0.100 of the code in dextrose, (patches [2] and >>> [3]) >>> but still think need more work before pushing upstream. >>> >>> Here my comments/questions: >>> >>> * Right now, the access to backup/restore functionality is available in >>> the menu >>> of the connected device (see [4]). May be should be in the Journal >>> button, >>> to allow other destinations in the future, like google drive/dropbox/etc? >>> Or should be as a option in the control panel? (If the control panel is >>> only >>> for configuration this may be not the right place) >>> >>> * The screen look alien [5]. Should be better if we add a toolbar or >>> should be in a modal dialog similar to the control panel/ object chooser? >>> >>> * We need a better icon. >>> >>> * The actual implementation have scripts to backup/restore from the >>> command line. >>> Then the sugar code execute the scripts, and the scripts execute tar. Is >>> needed >>> this indirection or should be better call tar from sugar? >>> >>> This implementation can be tested in our AU images [6] >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Backup_and_Restore >>> >>> [2] >>> https://github.com/godiard/au1b_rpms/blob/master/sugar/0001-Backup-and-Restore-to-a-mounted-device.patch >>> >>> [3] >>> https://github.com/godiard/au1b_rpms/blob/master/sugar/0001-Fix-backup-restore-functionality-SL-4616.patch >>> >>> [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Backup_usb_menu.png >>> >>> [5] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:Backup_before.png >>> >>> [6] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=0.100/Testing >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel