Oh, I understand now. So this isn't really a huge amount of people needing this :)
So sugar build half installs Fedora. I get you now. On Mar 9, 2014 2:38 PM, "Sebastian Silva" <[email protected]> wrote: > Nobody is discriminating only I supposed it's hard for a volunteer > (Daniel) to give support to every distro. > It's unsupported according to the docs here: > http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html#use_broot > > Regards, > Sebastian > > El 08/03/14 22:36, Sam Parkinson escribió: > > Forgot reply all. Sorry Sebastian for sending it 3 times. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Sam Parkinson" <[email protected]> > Date: Mar 9, 2014 2:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build on archlinux without broot > To: "Sebastian Silva" <[email protected]> > Cc: > > > Hi, > > > > I don't think we should discriminate based on distro. I can't see where > it says unsupported (and am not interested sorry). I was just going to add > a link in the docs :) > > > > Sam > > > > On Mar 9, 2014 2:31 PM, "Sebastian Silva" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> El 08/03/14 22:27, Gaurav Parida escribió: > >>> > >>> So, is sugar-build now installed as a dual-boot with ArchLinux ? > >>> I didn't know that we could set up sugar-build in such a way. when I > get time, I will also try to do it with Ubuntu. > >>> > >>> +1 for adding it to the docs. > >>> > >> Hi, > >> No, i only have Archlinux on my machine. sugar-build runs natively on > it, that was the point. > >> I don't think it's worth adding to the docs since it's unsupported > anyway, but perhaps on the wiki. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Sebastian > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing > [email protected]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
