For what it's worth it would be a -1 from me. I would be fine to delay a bit to fix important bugs, but not to add more features, it seems to go completely against the rationale of time based releases. But that's just my opinion.
On 10 March 2014 01:34, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Feel free to propose delaying feature freeze. The release was already a > week late, if we want more time to work on features, I tend to think the > final release should be pushed off accordingly too. > > > On 10 March 2014 01:21, Gonzalo Odiard <godi...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > >> We just finished the review of the design issues the last week, >> and we agreed in the general points. >> I think we should make a effort to finalize the features already >> discussed, >> and not include anything more. >> Maybe we can discuss postpone feature freeze by one or two weeks more, >> but of course this would be something to decide as a community. >> >> Gonzalo >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm releasing 0.101.3 and we are now feature frozen. I marked the pull >>> requests that introduce new features with a [Feature] prefix. I considered >>> closing them to unclutter the queue but then I thought it would be better >>> to keep them around to make sure they are not forgotten. If new pull >>> request which introduces features are posted let's mark them in a same way >>> (for new contributors let's also explain why we are doing that). >>> >>> Time to kill bugs! >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Narvaez >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Gonzalo Odiard >> >> SugarLabs - Learning Software for children >> > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
