Gonzalo, can you confirm which of these activities you maintain and if you are fine with the move? So I can try to hunt down the remaining maintainers.
On Friday, 4 April 2014, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I think we should move more of our modules to github, at least all the > ones we are currently building in sugar-build. > > That will make it easier for contributors because they won't have to go > through two different processes to submit patches. Also gitorious lacks pr > notifications which is really bad. > > Finally, it would make it easier to detect changes to the modules in > buildbot without having to poll, which is giving issues to our server (you > could probably do the same on gitorious, but I'm not really looking forward > to write and maintain that for two different services). I'm also planning > to add support for triggering builds on pr submission, so that broken ones > can be marked as such in the UI, and it would be good for all the modules > to benefit from this. > > So here are the modules I would like to move > > sugar > sugar-toolkit > browse > write > chat > read > log > terminal > pippy > imageviewer > jukebox > turtleart > > What needs to be done > > 1 Get permission from module maintainers. If you are reading this please > confirm you are fine with this. > 2 Mirror the modules on github. I can take care of that. > 3 Update sugar-build. I can take care of that. > 4 Update pootle. Gonzalo, did you volunteer? :) > 5 Setup a redirect from git.sugarlabs.org to github.com. Anyone knows > who/how did it for the core modules? > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel